Proposal: Laws

[adamownsya]

mayhem it causes accidents and when an accident occurs people want compensation and wen compensation is not met violence happens...

Cops should be dealing with more important things than accidents and speeding players, as there is much more disruptive behaviour out there. Like me, carving a path of wreckage across the map.

Do you have a choice to when a civ is screaming 911!! A RETARD FUCKING HIT MY CAR. it even states in the rules police need to take car of accdents...

[PurpleHazze]

I think people should have enough common sense to know wat is legal and is not

example: If Civ1 makes guns and then gives them out to other civs that dont have license
 and plan to commit hate crimes with the weapons that Civ 1 has supplied then its obvious that civ1 is commiting a crime here by giving out weapons to civs who dont have license or good intentions with the weapons. (most the time people work together and they know that the civs is going to go kill other civs or cops with that weapon)

Civ1 should be held responsible.

this is common sense here, and if someone was to say well thats not illegal, then wtf is it?
cause in any country i know of you cant sell guns to people with out proper license and registering  that isnt 3rd world lol

[majormayhem]

I think people should have enough common sense to know wat is legal and is not

example: If Civ1 makes guns and then gives them out to other civs that dont have license
 and plan to commit hate crimes with the weapons that Civ 1 has supplied then its obvious that civ1 is commiting a crime here by giving out weapons to civs who dont have license or good intentions with the weapons. (most the time people work together and they know that the civs is going to go kill other civs or cops with that weapon)

Civ1 should be held responsible.

this is common sense here, and if someone was to say well thats not illegal, then wtf is it?
cause in any country i know of you cant sell guns to people with out proper license and registering  that isnt 3rd world lol

Thats a fine line there. IMO, Civ 1 would be innocent, unless you have totaly overwhelming proof like seeing them talk about it in direct chat.

Do you have a choice to when a civ is screaming 911!! A RETARD FUCKING HIT MY CAR. it even states in the rules police need to take car of accdents...

Just making a point that murders and gunmen should be caught before cops go to hold the hands of car crash victims.

[adamownsya]

Im just making a point that the speed fines arent rediculous and speeding IS dangerous

[majormayhem]

Im just making a point that the speed fines arent rediculous and speeding IS dangerous

More than a man with a gun?

[adamownsya]

If it runs into a innocent civ and the man with the gun yes.

[majormayhem]

If it runs into a innocent civ and the man with the gun yes.

facepalm

[PurpleHazze]

I think people should have enough common sense to know wat is legal and is not

example: If Civ1 makes guns and then gives them out to other civs that dont have license
 and plan to commit hate crimes with the weapons that Civ 1 has supplied then its obvious that civ1 is commiting a crime here by giving out weapons to civs who dont have license or good intentions with the weapons. (most the time people work together and they know that the civs is going to go kill other civs or cops with that weapon)

Civ1 should be held responsible.

this is common sense here, and if someone was to say well thats not illegal, then wtf is it?
cause in any country i know of you cant sell guns to people with out proper license and registering  that isnt 3rd world lol

Thats a fine line there. IMO, Civ 1 would be innocent, unless you have totaly overwhelming proof like seeing them talk about it in direct chat.

Do you have a choice to when a civ is screaming 911!! A RETARD FUCKING HIT MY CAR. it even states in the rules police need to take car of accdents...

Just making a point that murders and gunmen should be caught before cops go to hold the hands of car crash victims.

Well ya Civ1 would only be charged with this crime if there was proof or a snitch giving this info or he was caught red handed

[adamownsya]

If it runs into a innocent civ and the man with the gun yes.

facepalm

What do you think is more dangerous? A guy holding a gun up to you? Or a guy in a 100kmh speeding chunk of metal wide enough to kill both od them? Also hostage sits always come before speeders

[majormayhem]

If it runs into a innocent civ and the man with the gun yes.

facepalm

What do you think is more dangerous? A guy holding a gun up to you? Or a guy in a 100kmh speeding chunk of metal wide enough to kill both od them? Also hostage sits always come before speeders

The gun. Your going to have really good reaction times to dodge that.